NASAA Urges Congress to Protect State Regulatory Authority in Digital Asset Bills

Steven Lofchie Commentary by Steven Lofchie
"As it stands now, the CLARITY Act and the DCIA contain provisions that need to be clarified, provisions that fraudsters could seek to exploit to evade enforcement under existing state securities and commodities anti-fraud laws."
NASAA Comment Letter
"As it stands now, the CLARITY Act and the DCIA contain provisions that need to be clarified, provisions that fraudsters could seek to exploit to evade enforcement under existing state securities and commodities anti-fraud laws."
NASAA Comment Letter

The North American Securities Administrators Association ("NASAA") submitted a comment letter urging congressional lawmakers to modify proposed digital asset legislation to ensure the preservation of essential state regulatory authority.

In the comment letter, NASAA asserted that Congress must preserve, in the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (the "CLARITY Act") and the Digital Commodity Intermediaries Act ("DCIA"), the "cooperative federalism framework" that allows states to regulate local markets. NASAA urged Congress to include, among other things, clear catch-all savings clauses to "confirm[] that neither the CLARITY Act nor the DCIA limits existing state securities and commodities anti-fraud authorities, including with respect to assets that are not 'digital assets'." The comment letter emphasized that not including such protections would create the potential for bad actors to exploit regulatory gaps to evade accountability.

Additionally, the comment letter focused on preserving the traditional legal test for investment contracts under the federal securities laws, known as the Howey test. NASAA cautioned that Congress "should not allow the displacement or narrowing in [the CLARITY Act or DCIA] of the well-established Howey test or investment contract analysis, whether directly or indirectly through SEC rulemaking or otherwise." 

Finally, NASAA requested that Congress "not risk upending the foundations of securities regulation by granting the SEC wide-ranging exemptive authority that can be exercised by order," bypassing the notice-and-comment process. 

Commentary

While securities regulation has always allowed for state enforcement authority, CFTC regulation and enforcement have generally been federal only. 

The development of prediction markets and of digital commodities, both of which may be primarily CFTC-regulated, will lead to jurisdictional battles between the CFTC and state regulators. Will the winner of the battles be decided by the courts (federal or state?) or by Congress? 

Email me about this

Tags