SEC Chair Urges Greater Transparency in Enforcement Processes

"[W]e are now in a different era. Markets have evolved, technologies have changed, and our enforcement program has grown and become more complex. And so again, I ask the question at the heart of our mission: how can we enforce the federal securities laws with fairness and transparency?"
Paul S. Atkins, SEC Chair
"[W]e are now in a different era. Markets have evolved, technologies have changed, and our enforcement program has grown and become more complex. And so again, I ask the question at the heart of our mission: how can we enforce the federal securities laws with fairness and transparency?"
Paul S. Atkins, SEC Chair

SEC Chair Paul S. Atkins proposed reforms to strengthen due process and transparency in the Commission's enforcement program.

Speaking at Fordham Law School, Mr. Atkins reaffirmed the "Wells" process as a "cornerstone of fairness" and a critical due process safeguard in the SEC’s enforcement program. He said the process helps the Commission consider alternative perspectives before charges are filed, reducing errors and bias.

Mr. Atkins called for (i) revising staff incentives to reward sound judgment rather than case volume, (ii) improving the clarity of Commission orders and closing letters, and (iii) ensuring uniform outcomes across divisions. He said the SEC must prioritize cases involving genuine harm and manage public resources responsibly. 

To strengthen the process, he recommended that Commission orders "provide the public with enough information to understand why conduct violated the federal securities laws, and why particular relief was imposed." He encouraged earlier dialogue in the process, through "white papers," to address factual or legal issues before investigations conclude. He said that "practices for issuing termination and closing letters should sufficiently permit potential respondents or defendants, as well as recipients of document requests and subpoenas, to understand an investigation has concluded." And he recommended the Commission "clearly explain the procedures by which individuals who are subject to associational and penny stock bars (which are intended to be protective, rather than punitive, measures) can seek reinstatement, and the standards that the Commission will apply in assessing their applications." Mr. Atkins added that all Wells submissions will now be shared with every Commissioner.

Mr. Atkins also highlighted the return to the Commission's prior practice of considering enforcement settlements and related waiver requests simultaneously. (See previous coverage.) He said the recent practice of reviewing them separately created inefficiency and uncertainty. He added that if the Commission accepts a settlement but denies a waiver, respondents will have the option to withdraw their offer.

Tags