Two Japanese corporations agreed to settle FTC charges for violating the premerger notification and waiting period requirements under the Hart-Scott-Rodino ("HSR") Act.
According to the Complaint, an independent investigation into the Toshiba Corporation found that it had been overstating its profits by billions. To repair its financial statement for FY 2015, Toshiba attempted to sell its subsidiary Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation ("TMSC") before the end of FY 2016 (March 31, 2016). The Complaint alleges that Toshiba did not resolve the TMSC sales process in a timely manner and found that, by early 2016, it would be almost impossible to file premerger notifications and receive premerger clearances in time.
According to the Complaint, to complete the acquisition before the end of FY 2016, Toshiba and one of its potential bidders, Canon Inc. ("Canon"), devised a plan to avoid (i) filing the notification and (ii) observing the waiting period. The companies completed this multi-step process as follows:
1. Toshiba and Canon created a special purpose company, the MS Holding Corporation ("MS Holding").
2. Toshiba rearranged the corporate ownership structure of TMSC by creating (i) new classes of voting shares, (ii) a single non-voting share with rights custom-made for Canon, and (iii) options convertible to ordinary shares.
3. Toshiba sold TMSC's non-voting share and newly created options to Canon for $6.1 billion while simultaneously transferring TMSC's voting shares to MS Holding for a nominal payment of $900.
4. Canon obtained formal control of TMSC's voting shares by exercising its options in December 2016.
The government alleged that the companies were hiding the "true nature of the acquisition" because Canon (i) bore the risks/benefits of TMSC - not MS Holding - and (ii) became the owner of TMSC in March 2016, when it paid Toshiba $6.1 billion.
The government asked the Court to assess a civil penalty of at least $6,360,000 for each Defendant.
According to the proposed Final Judgment, each Defendant will pay a civil penalty of $2.5 million. In addition, the Defendants agreed to (i) establish and maintain a compliance program to address the alleged violations and (ii) comply with inspection and reporting requirements.
Available only to Cabinet Premium subscribers.
Combining regulatory and enforcement news, analysis, and practical work tools on an easy-to-use digital platform.