SEC Staff Issues Letters Requiring Inclusion of "Social Policy" in Proxy Proposals
SEC staff issued several letters in response to a number of company requests to exclude social policy proposals in company proxy materials under Rule 14a-8 ("Shareholder Proposals").
In the letters, SEC staff:
- required Citigroup to include in its proxy statement shareholder proposal requests to the company’s board to adopt a policy that commits to taking proactive measures to ensure lending and underwriting practices do not contribute to new fossil fuel supplies by the end of 2022;
- required Tractor Supply Company to include in its proposal (i) a report on whether the company participates in compensation and workforce practices that prioritize the company’s financial performance over the economic and social costs and risks created by inequality and racial and gender disparities and (ii) how such "costs and risks threaten the returns of diversified shareholders who rely on a stable and productive economy";
- required Eli Lilly and Company to include in its proposal a report on the company’s lobbying expenditures; and
- required Eli Lilly and Company to include in its proposal (i) a third-party review on whether the company’s lobbying activities align with its position on public policy and public statements such as “making medicines more accessible and affordable to patients” and “fairness and transparency in the biopharma industry,” and (ii) describing how the company addresses risks associated with any misaligned lobbying and whether it has any plans to mitigate these risks.
The SEC Division of Corporation Finance recently emphasized its decision that proxy proposals by shareholders relating to matters of social policy must generally be included in a firm's proxy statement so long as there is some reasonable relationship between the proposal and the firm's business. (See, Staff Legal Bulletin 14L, and generally, SEC Director of Corporation Finance Elaborates on Proxy Proposals Relating to Social Policy). SEC staff warned that matters of social policy would not fall under the ordinary business exception from inclusion in a firm's proxy statement if the SEC determined that the issue is one of a “sufficiently significant social policy."
Commentary
Tractor Supply Company asked to exclude a proposal related to "(1) whether the Company participates in compensation and workforce practices that prioritize Company financial performance over the economic and social costs and risks created by inequality and racial gender disparities and (2) the manner in which any such costs and risks threaten returns of diversified shareholders who rely on a stable and productive economy."
Here is the website of Tractor Supply Company. One can reasonably suppose that the Company's president has not previously had to consider whether the company's attempting to make a profit might be threatening those shareholders who are relying on a stable and productive economy.
How should an issuer respond to a proposal like this? Should it attempt to argue that it puts profits secondary to the risks created by social disparities? Or should it say, we try to make a profit within the bounds of the law, and we don't believe that is threatening to diversified shareholders, but if you think that it is, maybe just invest elsewhere?