Partner
Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP
Steven Lofchie is a Partner based in New York. He advises financial institutions and corporate clients on the securities laws and the Commodity Exchange Act, with particular focus on the regulation of broker-dealers, swap dealers, investment funds and other market intermediaries. Steven's transactional practice focuses on securities credit and derivative transactions.
Recent Articles & Comments
The SEC has not undertaken a truly comprehensive review of its policies on the use of derivatives or effective leverage since its . Since that time, the SEC has come out with guidance as to different types of derivative and credit transactions, but such guidance treated economically similar products in dissimilar manners - an approach that reflects the absence of any well-defined agency policy. It is past due for the SEC to take a step back and to formulate (with investor and industry input…
The CFTC is moving away from the philosophy of "if it moves, regulate it." That Dodd-Frank philosophy never made the markets safer. Soaking up regulatory resources on matters of no regulatory consequence, or where there is another regulator involved, merely distracts regulators from matters of importance.
The exemption of BDCs from CPO registration is an example of a good step forward given that BDCs are already comprehensively regulated by the SEC. Hopefully, the CFTC will restore…
Are there uses of biometric data that are broadly objectionable, even if they produce a public good? H.R. 4008, a bill to prohibit the use of biometric recognition technology and biometric data analysis in certain federally assisted dwelling units, poses difficult questions. Are the persons who live in government housing being protected by such measures or are they being denied access to a tool that is available to others? As we begin to wrestle with issues as to permissible uses of data, a…
Center for Economic and Policy Research Co-Director Eileen Appelbaum appears to have strong objections to both the sale of stock to private investors and to public companies buying back their own stock. It should be apparent that no one will invest in a company unless they can eventually get money back out of the company; presumably, investors are looking to take out more money than they put in. Accordingly, Ms. Appelbaum may want to consider whether her proposals might have unintended…